Plastic Surgery Clinical Outcomes
Information on the service and clinical outcome results for the Plastic Surgery department at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH).
About the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service
We see children with a wide range of conditions both present at birth (congenital) or developed in childhood. Children who need plastic or reconstructive surgery are seen as outpatients, day case patients or inpatients.
As well as our five consultants, the surgical team consists of two specialist registrars, fellows in hand, cleft and craniofacial surgery, and two Trust doctors. Eight clinical nurse specialists, two occupational therapists and our departmental secretary complete the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department.
Our special areas of expertise include:
- craniofacial surgery
- cleft lip and palate repair
- congenital hand anomalies
- ear surgery
- vascular anomalies and birthmarks
- general plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Clinical outcome measures
Clinical outcomes are measurable changes in health, function or quality of life that result from our care. Constant review of our clinical outcomes establishes standards against which to continuously improve all aspects of our practice.
Functional and cosmetic outcome measure following pollicisation surgery
The Congenital Hand Anomalies Service at GOSH is one of the largest in the UK, offering reconstructive hand surgery and therapy to children with a variety of conditions.
Thumb hypoplasia is a congenital condition where the child is born with a small or absent thumb. It is often associated with radial ray dysplasia (RRD), also known as radial club hand. This condition affects the development of the whole arm and is classified from mild (Type I) to severe (Type IV). Thumb hypoplasia can also be isolated, with no other anomalies affecting the upper limb. Thumb hypoplasia is frequently treated by pollicisation surgery. This complex surgery constructs a new thumb using the index finger. Following surgery, hand therapy is provided by the occupational therapists to help children maximize the movement, strength, function, and appearance of their new thumb.
1. Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of thumb function and appearance
The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) was developed by the OTs to provide an insight into the parent and patient’s perspective of surgical outcome. It asks about type and frequency of thumb use, movement, strength, function and appearance. Parents or carers completed the PROM for children under 6 years of age. Children and young people aged 6 to 18 completed it themselves. The PROM results below include all patients with thumb hypoplasias, including isolated thumb hypoplasia and those associated with RRD.
|1. Do you use your thumb?|
I use my thumb spontaneously in
daily tasks (28/32)
I use my thumb in daily tasks
only when prompted / reminded (2/32)
|I never use my thumb (2/32)||6%|
2. How often do you use your thumb
to pick up large objects (eg a bottle)?
3. How often do you use your thumb
to pick up small objects (eg a pea)?
4. How often do you use your thumb
to manipulate small objects (eg doing up a button)?
Most patients (88%) report to use their thumb spontaneously in daily tasks, 6% when prompted or reminded and 6% reported never to use their thumb.
We asked how frequently patients use their thumb to pick up large objects and 44% reported to do this often, 53% reported sometimes and 3% reported never.
We asked how frequently patients use their thumb to pick up small objects and 44% reported to do this often, 47% reported sometimes and 9% reported never.
When we asked how frequently patients use their thumb to manipulate small objects, 38% reported to do this often, 41% reported sometimes and 22% reported never.
surgery, how satisfied are you with…
The appearance of your thumb
(how it looks)?
|The movement of your thumb?||66%||28%||6%|
The function of your thumb (how
|The strength of your thumb?||47%||38%||16%|
The majority of patients report to be satisfied with the appearance of their thumb (69%), their movement (66%) and function (53%). Thumb strength was reported to have the lowest level of satisfaction (47%).
2. Occupational Therapist assessment of strength
In addition to the PROM, the 6 to 18 year olds were also assessed for grip and pinch strength, and the results were compared to the normal population, matched for sex and age.
The results displayed are compared with normal population data, matched for sex and age. They demonstrate that following pollicisation surgery, grasp and pinch strength is always significantly less than normal, and the more severe the associated condition of RRD, the weaker the grip and pinch will be. For people with isolated thumb hypoplasia and mild RRD (type 1), average grip strength post-operatively is 39% of normal and pinch strength is 32%. For people with more severe RRD, the average grip strength post-operatively is 17% of normal and pinch is 15%.
The results of our PROM suggest pollicisation surgery is an effective treatment to improve the movement, function and appearance of the hand in children and young people with thumb hypoplasia. The pollicised digit is always significantly weaker when compared to normal thumb strength and has the lowest level of satisfaction. Patients report to using their thumb to pick up large objects more frequently than to pick up and manipulate small objects. Overall, the patients and families who have undergone pollicisation are satisfied with the outcome of their surgery.
We aim to direct all patients considering pollicisation surgery to this website to learn about our outcomes. This data helps our families to make informed decisions about surgery.
McQuiddy, V. A. et al. Normative Values for Grip and Pinch Strength for 6- to 19-Year-Olds, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96:1627-33 (2015)
Netscher, D. T. et al. Functional Outcomes of Children With Index Pollicizations for Thumb Deficiency, The Journal of Hand Surgery, 38:250-257 (2013)
de Kraker M. et al. Outcome after pollicization: comparison of patients with mild and severe longitudinal radial deficiency, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 131:544e-551e (2013)